On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This never went through it seems, it was sent before i was potentially
> deregistered.
I received it.
-root
Pavitra wrote:
> On Saturday 7 June 2008 12:13:46 Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Suggested fix for the first problem with 5542: If the prior judgement
>> ceases to be effective, then the contract is amended to read as it would
>> have if it had not been amended as specified by the prior judgement.
>
> Alte
On Saturday 7 June 2008 12:13:46 Ed Murphy wrote:
> Suggested fix for the first problem with 5542: If the prior judgement
> ceases to be effective, then the contract is amended to read as it would
> have if it had not been amended as specified by the prior judgement.
Alternatively:
When an
3 matches
Mail list logo
