On Saturday 7 June 2008 12:13:46 Ed Murphy wrote:
> Suggested fix for the first problem with 5542: If the prior judgement
> ceases to be effective, then the contract is amended to read as it would
> have if it had not been amended as specified by the prior judgement.
Alternatively:
When an applicable question on equation in an equity case has an
unsuspended judgement, and has had that judgement unsuspended
continuously for the past week (or all parties to the contract
have approved that judgement), the contract is amended as
specified in the judgement.
