Pavitra wrote: > On Saturday 7 June 2008 12:13:46 Ed Murphy wrote: >> Suggested fix for the first problem with 5542: If the prior judgement >> ceases to be effective, then the contract is amended to read as it would >> have if it had not been amended as specified by the prior judgement. > > Alternatively: > When an applicable question on equation in an equity case has an > unsuspended judgement, and has had that judgement unsuspended > continuously for the past week (or all parties to the contract > have approved that judgement), the contract is amended as > specified in the judgement.
IIRC, that's what 5542 would have done. The problem is that an equation can be appealed between 1 and 2 weeks after delivery, at which point it has already gone into effect.
