On 10/28/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 28 October 2007, Zefram wrote:
> > comex wrote:
> > > This could
> > > conflict with the higher-powered Rule 2169 if there was difficulty in
> > > applying equity cases to the Rules, but t
On Sunday 28 October 2007, Zefram wrote:
> comex wrote:
> > This could
> > conflict with the higher-powered Rule 2169 if there was difficulty in
> > applying equity cases to the Rules, but there is not.
>
> Who do you imagine might judge your equ
comex wrote:
> This could conflict
>with the higher-powered Rule 2169 if there was difficulty in applying
>equity cases to the Rules, but there is not.
Who do you imagine might judge your equity case, by the way?
-zefram
3 matches
Mail list logo
