On Sunday 28 October 2007, Zefram wrote: > comex wrote: > > This could > > conflict with the higher-powered Rule 2169 if there was difficulty in > > applying equity cases to the Rules, but there is not. > > Who do you imagine might judge your equity case, by the way? > > -zefram
Well, in a day or so I'll be able to initiate a criminal case accusing you of not assigning anyone :) Proto: Amend Rule 1868 by removing the requirement to make an assignment if there are no qualified judges. There are other situations where this could come up; such as a criminal case if everyone were hugging, or an equity case if there was a contest that everyone was part of.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
