On 10/28/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 28 October 2007, Zefram wrote:
> > comex wrote:
> > >                                                      This could
> > > conflict with the higher-powered Rule 2169 if there was difficulty in
> > > applying equity cases to the Rules, but there is not.
> >
> > Who do you imagine might judge your equity case, by the way?
> >
> > -zefram
>
> Well, in a day or so I'll be able to initiate a criminal case accusing you
> of not assigning anyone :)

The result of which must inevitably be either INNOCENT or EXCUSED, so
why bother?

-root

Reply via email to