On 10/28/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 28 October 2007, Zefram wrote: > > comex wrote: > > > This could > > > conflict with the higher-powered Rule 2169 if there was difficulty in > > > applying equity cases to the Rules, but there is not. > > > > Who do you imagine might judge your equity case, by the way? > > > > -zefram > > Well, in a day or so I'll be able to initiate a criminal case accusing you > of not assigning anyone :)
The result of which must inevitably be either INNOCENT or EXCUSED, so why bother? -root