Ratification takes effect relative to the publication of the document,
however. The context doesn't matter; if this document were ratified, then
it would be treated as true and correct; that is, it would be treated as if
it was a complete list of the proposal pool at the time of its publication.
O
If it isn't self-ratifying, you're not obliged to deal with it, I think.
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 at 00:09 Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm probably going to deny this, as there is (I think) a custom that the
> effective date of a revision is implied to be that of the o
I'm probably going to deny this, as there is (I think) a custom that the
effective date of a revision is implied to be that of the original report.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 9:04 PM Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Oh, also, just in case, to stop self-ratification: CoE: there are more
> proposals in th
reminder to self: Equity is Hard.
On Sun, 15 Oct 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
> True. But quorum is 8.0 right now. It has happened (actually twice,
> although one of the times ratified away) that proposals distributed on
> their own due to an error in the original pool did't meet quorum.
> Early
True. But quorum is 8.0 right now. It has happened (actually twice,
although one of the times ratified away) that proposals distributed on
their own due to an error in the original pool did't meet quorum.
Early in the week I was hoping Gaelan would revise eir proposal, as e
said e wanted to. Then I
In an equity sense, I'd say the significant delay for someone who paid
to pend a proposal is worse than the inconvenience of having to reply
to two voting messages to vote.
On Sun, 15 Oct 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
> If by "the report" you mean the one I just I did, I avoided that
> because I'm
For the sake of clarity, it is my interpretation of the relevant rules
that the Promotor is required to distribute all proposals once each
week, but not necessarily to distribute _all_ proposals in a given
week. I did so last week, with the ones I know about, and will do it
again this week. Either
If by "the report" you mean the one I just I did, I avoided that
because I'm preparing the next report and its easier for people to
vote when everything is in one place.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> I would submit, as arguments, that the Promotor was reminded and h
I would submit, as arguments, that the Promotor was reminded and had the
opportunity to avoid the violation by distributing the proposal at the time
of the report.
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017, 17:59 Aris Merchant, <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Very true. I plead guilty and request the m
Very true. I plead guilty and request the mercy of the Referee for
this error, noting that it was an inadvertent mistake.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> I Point a Finger at Aris, alleging that e failed to distribute the proposal
> identified below as pp3 last week, t
10 matches
Mail list logo
