If by "the report" you mean the one I just I did, I avoided that because I'm preparing the next report and its easier for people to vote when everything is in one place.
-Aris On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would submit, as arguments, that the Promotor was reminded and had the > opportunity to avoid the violation by distributing the proposal at the time > of the report. > > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017, 17:59 Aris Merchant, > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Very true. I plead guilty and request the mercy of the Referee for >> this error, noting that it was an inadvertent mistake. >> >> -Aris >> >> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I Point a Finger at Aris, alleging that e failed to distribute the >> > proposal >> > identified below as pp3 last week, thereby failing to distribute all >> > pending >> > proposals. >> > >> > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017, 17:38 Aris Merchant, >> > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> This following is a revision to the proposal pool from my last report. >> >> >> >> The proposal pool contains the following proposals: >> >> >> >> ID Author(s) AI Title >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> pp1 nichdel 3.0 Slower Promotion >> >> pp2 nichdel 1.0 Guaranteed Stampage >> >> pp3* Alexis 3.0 Clarity Act >> >> pp4* Gaelan 1.0 Another Economy Fix Attempt >> >> >> >> Legend: <ID>* : Proposal is pending. >> >> >> >> The full text of the aforementioned proposals is included below. >> >> >> >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> >> ID: pp1 >> >> Title: Slower Promotion >> >> Adoption index: 3.0 >> >> Author: nichdel >> >> Co-authors: >> >> >> >> >> >> Amend R1607 (Distribution) by replacing: >> >> >> >> In a given Agoran week, the Promotor SHALL, as part of eir weekly >> >> duties, >> >> distribute all pending proposals. >> >> >> >> with >> >> >> >> In a given Agoran week, as part of eir weekly duties, the Promotor >> >> SHALL: >> >> >> >> * distribute all pending proposals if there are no unresolved >> >> Agoran >> >> decisions to adopt a proposal. >> >> >> >> * list all unresolved Agoran decisions to adopt a proposal. The >> >> Promotor >> >> MAY still distribute all pending proposals. >> >> >> >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> >> ID: pp2 >> >> Title: Guaranteed Stampage >> >> Adoption index: 1.0 >> >> Author: nichdel >> >> Co-authors: >> >> >> >> >> >> Amend 2499 "Welcome Packages" to read in full: >> >> >> >> If a player has not received one since e most recently became a >> >> player, any player CAN, by announcement, cause em to receive a >> >> Welcome package. When a player receives a Welcome Package: >> >> >> >> * Agora transfers em 1/10th the FV in shinies and >> >> >> >> * a Stamp, with Agora as the Creater, is created in eir >> >> possession. >> >> >> >> Amend R2498 to be titled "Stamps" and to read in full: >> >> >> >> Stamps are an asset. The Secretary is the recordkeepor of Stamps. >> >> >> >> Each Stamp has an associated Creater which SHOULD be noted whenever >> >> the >> >> Stamp >> >> is mentioned and MUST be noted whenever the Stamp is transfered. >> >> Stamps >> >> with >> >> the same creater are fungible. >> >> >> >> Once per month a player CAN, by announcement, create a Stamp with >> >> themselves >> >> as the Creater by transferring the Stamp Value, in shinies, to Agora. >> >> >> >> If Agora owns at least as many Shinies as the current Stamp Value, a >> >> player >> >> CAN, by announcement, destroy a Stamp e owns to cause Agora to >> >> transfer >> >> the >> >> Stamp Value, in shinies, to emself. >> >> >> >> Enact a Power 1 rule titled "Stamp Wins" with the following text: >> >> >> >> If a player owns 10 stamps with different Creaters, none of which >> >> have >> >> Agora >> >> as its Creater, e CAN win by announcement. Doing so destroys the >> >> specified >> >> stamps. >> >> >> >> Enact a Power 1 rule titled "Basic Stamp Income" with the following >> >> text: >> >> >> >> When the Secretary publishes the first Weekly Report of an Agoran >> >> Month, >> >> e >> >> CAN and SHALL, by announcement, create Stamps with Agora as the >> >> Creater >> >> and >> >> transfer them to any player who has no stamps and less than the Stamp >> >> Value >> >> in shinies at the time of publication. >> >> >> >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> >> ID: pp3 >> >> Title: Clarity Act >> >> Adoption index: 3.0 >> >> Author: Alexis >> >> Co-authors: >> >> >> >> Text in square brackets is not a part of this proposal's substance and >> >> is ignored when it takes effect. >> >> >> >> Enact a new power 3 rule entitled Voting Methods, reading as follows: >> >> Each Agoran decision has a voting method, which must be >> >> AI-majority, instant runoff, or first-past-the-post. The voting >> >> method is that specified by the authorizing authority, or >> >> first-past-the-post by default. >> >> >> >> Each Agoran decision has a set of valid options (the choices that >> >> the voters are being asked to select from) and valid votes (the >> >> ways in which the voters can express their opinion or lack >> >> thereof. >> >> For AI-majority decisions, the valid options are FOR and AGAINST; >> >> for other decisions, the valid options are defined by other >> >> rules. >> >> >> >> The valid votes on an Agoran decision are: >> >> 1. PRESENT; >> >> 2. The valid conditional votes, as defined by rules of power at >> >> least that of this rule; and >> >> 3. For an instant runoff decision, the ordered lists of entities. >> >> 4. For any other decision, the valid options. >> >> >> >> [This splits off the portion of 955 that isn't actually related to >> >> resolution. The definition of instant runoff is changed to evaluate >> >> validity of options at the end of the voting period, and avoid >> >> retroactively invalidating votes if an option drops out.] >> >> >> >> Amend Rule 955 by replacing the second paragraph and numbered list with >> >> the following and by deleting the second bullet in the unnumbered list. >> >> 1. For an AI-majority decision, let F be the total strength of >> >> all >> >> valid ballots cast FOR a decision, A be the same for AGAINST, >> >> and AI be the adoption index of the decision. The outcome is >> >> ADOPTED if F/A >= AI and F/A > 1 (or F>0 and A=0), otherwise >> >> REJECTED. >> >> >> >> 2. For an instant runoff decision, the outcome is whichever >> >> option >> >> wins according to the standard definition of instant runoff. >> >> For this purpose, a ballot of strength N is treated as if it >> >> were N distinct ballots expressing the same preferences. In >> >> case multiple valid options tie for the lowest number of votes >> >> at any stage, the vote collector CAN and must, in the >> >> announcement of the decision's resolution, select one such >> >> option to eliminate; if, for M > 1, all eir possible choices >> >> in >> >> the next M stages would result in the same set of options >> >> being >> >> eliminated, e need not specify the order of elimination. If an >> >> entity that is part of a valid vote is not a valid option at >> >> the end of the voting period, or disqualified by the rule >> >> providing for the decision, then that entity is eliminated >> >> prior to the first round of counting. >> >> >> >> 3. For a first-past-the-post decision, the outcome is whichever >> >> option received the highest total strength of valid ballots. >> >> In >> >> case of a tie, the vote collector CAN and must, in the >> >> announcement of the decision's resolution, select one of the >> >> leaders as the outcome. >> >> >> >> [No change here, except for removing the valid votes, and clearly >> >> specifying what happens to options that are no longer valid at the end >> >> of the voting period.] >> >> >> >> If the text "The rule providing for an Agoran Decision by instant >> >> runoff >> >> may disqualify one or more options; in such a case, they are eliminated >> >> prior to beginning the first stage of the vote count." appears in Rule >> >> 955, delete it. >> >> >> >> [Coordinating amendment to the Election Procedure proposal. H. >> >> Assessor, >> >> please resolve that one first.] >> >> >> >> Amend Rule 2127 to read as follows: >> >> A conditional vote on an Agoran decision is a vote which >> >> indicates >> >> a vote based on some condition(s). A conditional vote is >> >> evaluated >> >> at the end of the voting period and, rules to the contrary >> >> notwithstanding, is clearly specified if and only if the value of >> >> the condition(s) is/are determinate at the end of the voting >> >> period. If the conditional is clearly specified, and evaluates to >> >> a valid vote, it is counted as that vote; otherwise, it is >> >> counted >> >> as PRESENT. >> >> >> >> Any vote which is clearly expressed as a conditional, e.g. "FOR >> >> if >> >> <X> is true, AGAINST otherwise", is a valid conditional vote that >> >> evaluates as specified. >> >> >> >> A vote endorsing another person is equivalent to a conditional >> >> vote evaluating to the vote specified in that person's valid >> >> ballot on the decision, if any. >> >> >> >> For an instant runoff decision, a vote consisting of a list, one >> >> or more entries of which are valid conditional votes, and the >> >> remaining entries of which are valid options, is a valid >> >> conditional vote. Such a vote is evaluated by evaluating each >> >> conditional entry to a list of votes (or an empty list, if it >> >> evaluates to PRESENT either directly or indirectly), and then >> >> concatenating those lists with the specified valid options in the >> >> order they occurred in the original vote. >> >> >> >> [New conditional vote rule clearly specifies what conditional votes are >> >> valid, as well as providing for evaluation of conditional lists in >> >> instant runoff in the sensible way.] >> >> >> >> Amend Rule 2438 by replacing the paragraph describing Orange >> >> Ribbons with: >> >> >> >> Orange (O): When a proposal is adopted via an Agoran Decision on >> >> which no valid ballots were AGAINST (after evaluating >> >> conditionals), its proposer earns an Orange Ribbon. >> >> >> >> Award G. a Transparent Ribbon. >> >> >> >> [I accept that it's fair that this may not actually be a problem, >> >> but clarifying it and converging gamestate does not hurt.] >> >> >> >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> >> ID: pp4 >> >> Title: Another Economy Fix Attempt >> >> Adoption index: 1.0 >> >> Author: Gaelan >> >> Co-authors: >> >> >> >> >> >> Create a power-1 rule titled "Keep it up" with the following text: >> >> === >> >> If an action defined entirely by the rules that would otherwise be >> >> POSSIBLE for a player to perform is IMPOSSIBLE due to Agora having a >> >> low shiny balance, that player may win the game with 2 Days Notice. >> >> Upon doing so, half of all player's shiny balances (rounded down) are >> >> transferred to Agora. >> >> === >> >> >> >> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
