True. But quorum is 8.0 right now. It has happened (actually twice, although one of the times ratified away) that proposals distributed on their own due to an error in the original pool did't meet quorum. Early in the week I was hoping Gaelan would revise eir proposal, as e said e wanted to. Then I was busy. Now I have time, but I'm going to do the entire report soon, so it made sense to consolidate.
-Aris On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > In an equity sense, I'd say the significant delay for someone who paid > to pend a proposal is worse than the inconvenience of having to reply > to two voting messages to vote. > > On Sun, 15 Oct 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: >> If by "the report" you mean the one I just I did, I avoided that >> because I'm preparing the next report and its easier for people to >> vote when everything is in one place. >> >> -Aris >> >> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I would submit, as arguments, that the Promotor was reminded and had the >> > opportunity to avoid the violation by distributing the proposal at the time >> > of the report. >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017, 17:59 Aris Merchant, >> > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Very true. I plead guilty and request the mercy of the Referee for >> >> this error, noting that it was an inadvertent mistake. >> >> >> >> -Aris > >
