DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8657-8664

2022-03-31 Thread nix via agora-discussion
On 3/27/22 18:49, nix via agora-business wrote: >>> 8660* nix, G., Jason, snail 3.0 The End of Sets >> FOR > I change my vote to PRESENT. Some people seem still interested, so if > this fails I'll try doing some revisions instead to keep the same > economy but freshened up. I change this vot

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8657-8664

2022-03-28 Thread juan via agora-discussion
On 2022-03-26 02:46, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: > This kind of vote is extremely annoying to deal with and doesn't seem to > actually gain you anything for these proposals. I ask you to reconsider. It does. I voted this way in good faith, as I have little experience in evaluating proposa

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8657-8664

2022-03-27 Thread nix via agora-discussion
On 3/27/22 19:04, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote: > An alternative idea, which I had more recently: a contract can specify > itself as an economic contract, a player can join at most one economic > contract at a time, and the three economic contracts with the most > members are granted a regular

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8657-8664

2022-03-27 Thread ais523 via agora-discussion
On Sun, 2022-03-27 at 23:49 +, nix via agora-business wrote: > On 3/26/22 10:07, nix via agora-business wrote: > > > 8660* nix, G., Jason, snail 3.0 The End of Sets > > FOR > > I change my vote to PRESENT. Some people seem still interested, so if > this fails I'll try doing some revision

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8657-8664

2022-03-27 Thread Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
G. wrote: 8657* Murphy 3.0 Schrodinger's report AGAINST. It's a bit against the flow but I think Festivity *when it is relevant* is important to note weekly. The intent of the proposal is that the Tailor SHALL still announce the value weekly when it's relevant, just swit