On 31 January 2012 05:49, omd wrote:
> To anticipate a possible objection, I retract this vote and submit an
> identical one except clarifying that the U.S. edition should be used,
> even though that URL sometimes redirects to http://global.nytimes.com/
> depending on your settings.
Please define
Pavitra wrote:
Doesn't the voting period only end at the instant that someone sends a
particular message?
No, the voting period ends (normally) one week after it starts. What
depends on a message is the resolution of the decision.
On 01/30/2012 06:14 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Pavitra wrote:
>> On 01/30/2012 05:00 PM, omd wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 4:31 AM, 441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote:
#ELECTIONS#
>>>
>>> On each electio
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Pavitra wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 05:00 PM, omd wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 4:31 AM, 441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> #ELECTIONS#
> >
> > On each election I vote conditionally for the candidate whose na
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:26 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 18:23 -0500, omd wrote:
>> TTttPF != NttPF.
>
> Wait, is it even possible to TTttPF someone else's message?
I vaguely recall that this has been tried before, but I'm too lazy to
look it up.
On 01/30/2012 05:26 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 18:23 -0500, omd wrote:
>> TTttPF != NttPF.
>
> Wait, is it even possible to TTttPF someone else's message?
Why not?
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 18:23 -0500, omd wrote:
> TTttPF != NttPF.
Wait, is it even possible to TTttPF someone else's message?
--
ais523
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:07 PM, ais523 wrote:
>> TTttPF
>
> And I went to all the trouble of writing
>
> "To:
> deliberately nttpf
> "
>
> and someone /still/ calls me on it…?
TTttPF != NttPF.
On 01/30/2012 05:00 PM, omd wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 4:31 AM, 441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> #ELECTIONS#
>
> On each election I vote conditionally for the candidate whose name is
> closest to the first word of the primary
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 18:02 -0500, omd wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:47 PM, ais523 wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:43 -0600, Flameshadowxeroshin wrote:
> >> Just for clarification, I intend to endorse Wooble.
> >
> > I intend without objection to intend with support to endorse Wooble.
>
I object.
On Jan 30, 24 Heisei, at 11:47 AM, ais523 wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:43 -0600, Flameshadowxeroshin wrote:
>> Just for clarification, I intend to endorse Wooble.
>
> I intend without objection to intend with support to endorse Wooble.
>
> --
> ais523
>
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:43 -0600, Flameshadowxeroshin wrote:
> Just for clarification, I intend to endorse Wooble.
I intend without objection to intend with support to endorse Wooble.
--
ais523
Just for clarification, I intend to endorse Wooble.
FSX wrote:
I'm trying to make the same actions.
Just quoting isn't clear enough (you could have been intending to say
something else in response), you have to say "I vote the same way" or
the like.
I'm trying to make the same actions.
On Jan 30, 24 Heisei, at 10:35 AM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:36 AM, FSX wrote:
>> On Jan 30, 24 Heisei, at 6:02 AM, Geoffrey Spear
>> wrote:
>>> . . .
>
> Are you taking the same actions that Wooble's taking here, or simply
> quoti
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:36 AM, FSX wrote:
> On Jan 30, 24 Heisei, at 6:02 AM, Geoffrey Spear
> wrote:
>> . . .
Are you taking the same actions that Wooble's taking here, or simply
quoting them?
—Niccolò "Soprannome che Confonde" di Bernardo dei Machiavelli
ehird wrote:
I assume Murphy and vote Murphy in all current elections.
CoE: No you don't.
I assume Murphy and vote Murphy in all current elections.
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 22:16 -0400, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> > For Clerk of the Courts, the valid options are Murphy and Goethe.
> Goethe withdrew, so my vote is irrelevant.
Not quite. My reading of the rule in question (which is really buggy and
needs fixing) is that Goethe can still be elected if
On 30 Sep 2008, at 14:07, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, where da mad scientist elections be at?
The nomination period hasn't ended yet.
Ah. Silly me.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, where da mad scientist elections be at?
The nomination period hasn't ended yet.
21 matches
Mail list logo
