On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 21:36 -0400, Warrigal wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:41 PM, ais523 wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 20:36 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
> >> There is a nomic [of admittedly questionable nomicness, but not
> >> existence, I think] called The Robot...
> >
> > Warrigal's one where caus
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:41 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 20:36 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
>> There is a nomic [of admittedly questionable nomicness, but not
>> existence, I think] called The Robot...
>
> Warrigal's one where causality works backwards?
No, H. Sgeo's one where all events take
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 20:36 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
> There is a nomic [of admittedly questionable nomicness, but not
> existence, I think] called The Robot...
Warrigal's one where causality works backwards?
I'm not convinced that is actually a nomic.
--
ais523
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:12 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 17:07 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> === CFJ 2849 (Interest Index = 0)
>>
>> The Rule enacted by Proposal 6808 refers to coppro when it
>> speaks of "The Robot".
>>
>>
4 matches
Mail list logo