omd wrote:
>> I support and do so.
>
> You can't; the judgement was made more than seven days ago.
Bah, I misremembered this time limit as being two weeks, same as
calling for appeal. Some of my other recent actions may have been
similarly ineffective, then; will go through and check later. (I
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> omd wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Elliott Hird
>> wrote:
>>> On 17 April 2011 04:29, omd wrote:
Oh, fine. Â I judge TRUE.
>>>
>>> I intend to Motion to Reconsider with two support with the argument:
>>> "The fact that G. d
On 19 April 2011 20:42, Elliott Hird wrote:
> Apparently there is an already-existing intent (though I haven't seen
> one). Care to support that instead?
Disregard this, thought it was a different CFJ.
On 19 April 2011 20:25, omd wrote:
>> I intend to Motion to Reconsider with two support with the argument:
>> "The fact that G. doesn't know that about omd does not negate the
>> validity and rule-abiding argument he made."
>
> I support.
Apparently there is an already-existing intent (though I h
4 matches
Mail list logo