On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote:
> omd wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Elliott Hird
>> <penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> On 17 April 2011 04:29, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Oh, fine. Â I judge TRUE.
>>>
>>> I intend to Motion to Reconsider with two support with the argument:
>>> "The fact that G. doesn't know that about omd does not negate the
>>> validity and rule-abiding argument he made."
>>
>> I support.
>
> I support and do so.
You can't; the judgement was made more than seven days ago.

Reply via email to