On 19 April 2011 20:25, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I intend to Motion to Reconsider with two support with the argument: >> "The fact that G. doesn't know that about omd does not negate the >> validity and rule-abiding argument he made." > > I support.
Apparently there is an already-existing intent (though I haven't seen one). Care to support that instead?
