Oops, I was going to submit some gratuitous arguments, and I plumb
forgot. To be honest, I'm tired of griping about this anyway, so I
don't think that I'll bother.
>a) Should Rule 754 (3)'s "primarily used in ... legal contexts" be
> interpreted as "primarily used by Agora in legal cont
On 7/29/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Taral wrote:
> >I had no reason to believe that "Blob" was not simply a nickname for a
> >person.
>
> It certainly is a nickname for a person. That person has consistently
> claimed that e is not human.
I have no reason to believe that any more tha
Taral wrote:
>I had no reason to believe that "Blob" was not simply a nickname for a person.
It certainly is a nickname for a person. That person has consistently
claimed that e is not human.
-zefram
On 7/27/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you going to be the one to tell Blob that?
I had no reason to believe that "Blob" was not simply a nickname for a person.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
Eris wrote:
On 7/27/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
a) Should Rule 754 (3)'s "primarily used in ... legal contexts" be
interpreted as "primarily used by Agora in legal contexts", or
"primarily used by the English-speaking population in general in
legal contexts"?
On 7/27/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>a) Should Rule 754 (3)'s "primarily used in ... legal contexts" be
> interpreted as "primarily used by Agora in legal contexts", or
> "primarily used by the English-speaking population in general in
> legal contexts"? In the f
6 matches
Mail list logo
