On 7/27/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a) Should Rule 754 (3)'s "primarily used in ... legal contexts" be
> interpreted as "primarily used by Agora in legal contexts", or
> "primarily used by the English-speaking population in general in
> legal contexts"? In the former case, Rule 754 (3) applies; in
> the latter, it does not.
This is somewhat time-reversed analysis. "person" was "human" until
Zefram decided that maybe legal "persons" might be allowed.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
