DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Secure points

2008-10-10 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I submit the following proposal titled "Secure points": > > Upmutate Rule 2136 to power 2. > Upmutate Rule 2179 to power 2, and amend it by appending to the first > paragraph the text: > > Changes to point holdings are secu

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Secure points

2008-10-09 Thread comex
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If we wanted wins to be easily scammable at power 1, we wouldn't have > winning secured at power 2. Boring. Ladder scamming from Power=2 to Power=3 is probably relatively easy (although I haven't looked into it in depth), wher

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Secure points

2008-10-09 Thread ais523
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:58 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 12:38 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:36 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: > >> I submit the following proposal titled "Secure points": > >> > >> Upmutate Rule 2136 to power 2. > >> Upmutate Rule 2

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Secure points

2008-10-09 Thread Ian Kelly
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 12:38 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:36 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: >> I submit the following proposal titled "Secure points": >> >> Upmutate Rule 2136 to power 2. >> Upmutate Rule 2179 to power 2, and amend it by appending to the first >> paragr

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Secure points

2008-10-09 Thread ais523
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:36 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: > I submit the following proposal titled "Secure points": > > Upmutate Rule 2136 to power 2. > Upmutate Rule 2179 to power 2, and amend it by appending to the first > paragraph the text: > > Changes to point holdings are secured. > They w