On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:58 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 12:38 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:36 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> >> I submit the following proposal titled "Secure points":
> >>
> >> Upmutate Rule 2136 to power 2.
> >> Upmutate Rule 2179 to power 2, and amend it by appending to the first
> >> paragraph the text:
> >>
> >> Changes to point holdings are secured.
> >>
> > They were at least a reasonably non-obnoxious way to scam a win at Power
> > 1. If I'd had to do it some other way, it might have caused a lot more
> > lasting damage to the gamestate.
>
> If we wanted wins to be easily scammable at power 1, we wouldn't have
> winning secured at power 2.
>
I think my point is that there are other ways, but they involve more
scrambling of the gamestate. You could redefine Agora's Birthday, for
instance, which might or might not help.
--
ais523
