Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Probably the last one for now.

2018-10-18 Thread Alex Smith
On Thu, 2018-10-18 at 21:35 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > It never has and it never will. Ruleset ratification causes nasty > formatting problems, and leaves the door open for some extremely > dangerous scams. Anyhow, unless someone has gone and ratified it by > proposal without me noticing (hard,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Probably the last one for now.

2018-10-18 Thread Aris Merchant
It never has and it never will. Ruleset ratification causes nasty formatting problems, and leaves the door open for some extremely dangerous scams. Anyhow, unless someone has gone and ratified it by proposal without me noticing (hard, given that I’m Promotor, although I’ve managed to forget things

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Probably the last one for now.

2018-10-18 Thread Reuben Staley
It doesn't? Well clearly I am not a reliable source for information about ratification. On 10/18/2018 10:28 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: Wait, sorry. What do you mean ruleset ratification? We haven’t ratified the ruleset in almost a year, if my memory is correct. It isn’t self-ratifying. -Aris On

DIS: Re: BUS: Probably the last one for now.

2018-10-18 Thread Aris Merchant
Wait, sorry. What do you mean ruleset ratification? We haven’t ratified the ruleset in almost a year, if my memory is correct. It isn’t self-ratifying. -Aris On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 9:14 PM Reuben Staley wrote: > This rule was changed to a strange list formatting method by ruleset > ratificatio