Re: DIS: Re: BUS: PAP1

2007-07-11 Thread Ian Kelly
On 7/11/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I hereby call for judgement, barring root, comex, and BobTHJ, on the statement: to qualify as a member of a partnership one must be responsible for all of the partnership's obligations. Argument: Legal partnerships in most jurisdictions make all par

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: PAP1

2007-07-11 Thread Zefram
Peekee wrote: > Why should >(theoretically, not in terms of current rules) every member be >responsible for everything? That's the way a legal partnership usually works. Of course members of a partnership divide up responsibilities internally, but

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: PAP1

2007-07-11 Thread Peekee
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Peekee wrote: The partnership would have devolved all of its obligation. Obligations are only devolved onto parties of the agreement. The parties onto which the obligations are devolved number at least two. Hmm. You might have found a bug there, it depends

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: PAP1

2007-07-11 Thread Zefram
Peekee wrote: >The partnership would have devolved all of its obligation. >Obligations are only devolved onto parties of the agreement. >The parties onto which the obligations are devolved number at least two. Hmm. You might have found a bug there, it depends on how "collectively" is interpreted.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: PAP1

2007-07-11 Thread Peekee
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Peekee wrote: Does it need to pass all of its obligations onto all of its members? Yes, that's how "member" is defined. -zefram A binding agreement governed by the rules which devolves its legal obligations onto a subset of its parties, num

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: PAP1

2007-07-11 Thread Zefram
Peekee wrote: >Does it need to pass all of its obligations onto all of its members? Yes, that's how "member" is defined. -zefram

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: PAP1

2007-07-11 Thread Peekee
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Peekee wrote: What are the rules that specify that obligations of a Partnership must be devolved to ALL of its members/parties? That's not required. The requirement is that the obligations be devolved onto at least two parties, who are then known as the me

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: PAP1

2007-07-10 Thread Zefram
Peekee wrote: >What are the rules that specify that obligations of a Partnership must >be devolved to ALL of its members/parties? That's not required. The requirement is that the obligations be devolved onto at least two parties, who are then known as the members. >Rule 2145/1 (Power=1) Out o

DIS: Re: BUS: PAP1

2007-07-10 Thread Peekee
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Peekee wrote: 3. The sole purpose of this Agreement is to create a Partnership for the nomic Agora. The Parties of this Agreement are the Members of the Partnership. ... 6. Peekee shall ensure that the Partnership satisfies all obligations that it incur