On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:08 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, I was surprised at how short it was. Our ratification is
> working well; probably the other things that need to self-ratify are
> these:
> - the existence of a CFJ
> - the success of a deputised action
> - the verdict of
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 12:16 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:08 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - the existence of a CFJ
> > - the success of a deputised action
> > - the verdict of a CFJ
>
> Why deputised actions? They're no different in this regard than any
> other
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:08 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - the existence of a CFJ
> - the success of a deputised action
> - the verdict of a CFJ
Why deputised actions? They're no different in this regard than any
other official action.
-root
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 19:08 +0100, ais523 wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 10:57 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > ais523 wrote:
> >
> > > I submit the following proposal (AI=3, II=1, Title="Combining the
> > > Gamestates"):
> >
> > Ow. We really should just be able to do this:
> >
> > "Ratify the fo
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 10:57 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
> > I submit the following proposal (AI=3, II=1, Title="Combining the
> > Gamestates"):
>
> Ow. We really should just be able to do this:
>
> "Ratify the following document: {{{ tusho was a player
>during . }}}"
>
> a
ais523 wrote:
> I submit the following proposal (AI=3, II=1, Title="Combining the
> Gamestates"):
Ow. We really should just be able to do this:
"Ratify the following document: {{{ tusho was a player
during . }}}"
and have it clearly generate knock-on effects similar to those listed
in yo
6 matches
Mail list logo
