On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:08 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, I was surprised at how short it was. Our ratification is > working well; probably the other things that need to self-ratify are > these: > - the existence of a CFJ > - the success of a deputised action > - the verdict of a CFJ > Apart from that, everything turned out fine.
Still, when some things but not others are ratified, things turn out weirdly. For example, if it ratified that tusho was never a player, and someone initiated a criminal case with eir support, then initiated five other CFJs, the last of which the CotC refused, the criminal case wouldn't have existed and the "excess" CFJ was in fact valid... still requiring a judge. Not that I'm saying any of that happened, it's just an example.
