On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 10:57 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
> > I submit the following proposal (AI=3, II=1, Title="Combining the
> > Gamestates"):
>
> Ow. We really should just be able to do this:
>
> "Ratify the following document: {{{ tusho was a player
> during <time periods>. }}}"
>
> and have it clearly generate knock-on effects similar to those listed
> in your proposal.
>
> Or, using the (albeit controversial) form that I think I used to
> patch over the Annabel crisis, among other occasions:
>
> "Upon the adoption of this proposal, the gamestate becomes
> what it would have been if tusho had been a player during
> <time periods>."
Actually, I was surprised at how short it was. Our ratification is
working well; probably the other things that need to self-ratify are
these:
- the existence of a CFJ
- the success of a deputised action
- the verdict of a CFJ
Apart from that, everything turned out fine.
--
ais523
