On 2/13/2019 8:05 AM, D. Margaux wrote:
>> Further, the provisions (text) of an agreement CANNOT be amended
>> without providing all parties to the agreement a reasonable
>> opportunity to review the potential amendments.
>
> Note that the above clause isn’t as significant a pr
Seems like a good idea. Some suggested edits are added in capital letters
below.
> On Feb 13, 2019, at 10:55 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Create the following Rule, "No Mousetraps", at Power 3.1:
> Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, a person CANNOT be bound to
> abide by any agr
On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 07:55 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Create the following Rule, "No Mousetraps", at Power 3.1:
Should be above ratification, below precedence between rules. That
would imply a power of 3.2.
--
ais523
On 2/13/2019 7:29 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
Aand that's that.
Oh well, even if the scam didn't work in the end, at least it stimulated some
interesting philosphical discussion :P
-twg
Yeah, I really did think the argument was plausible at first, but the
various routes in assuming it
Aand that's that.
Oh well, even if the scam didn't work in the end, at least it stimulated some
interesting philosphical discussion :P
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 3:16 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I judge CFJ 3708 as follows:
>
> When a person be
Sorry, I've been favoring more than usual recently because, with only like 3
judges on the Court lists atm, it was about my turn anyway so why not speed
up the process. If there were more judges in regular rotation I definitely
wouldn't jump in quite so much...?
On 2/10/2019 1:35 PM, Cuddle Be
Sorry CB! I considered it to be linked with the other CFJs just given to G.
> On Feb 10, 2019, at 4:35 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> I was about to say that I favored the CFJ but oh well.
>
>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 19:49, D. Margaux wrote:
>>
>> I CFJ: “The parties to an existing contract CAN a
I was about to say that I favored the CFJ but oh well.
On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 19:49, D. Margaux wrote:
> I CFJ: “The parties to an existing contract CAN agree to amend it by
> adding additional players as parties, even if those additional players did
> not expressly agree to be party to that con
8 matches
Mail list logo
