Sorry, I've been favoring more than usual recently because, with only like 3
judges on the Court lists atm, it was about my turn anyway so why not speed
up the process. If there were more judges in regular rotation I definitely
wouldn't jump in quite so much...?
On 2/10/2019 1:35 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
I was about to say that I favored the CFJ but oh well.
On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 19:49, D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote:
I CFJ: “The parties to an existing contract CAN agree to amend it by
adding additional players as parties, even if those additional players did
not expressly agree to be party to that contract apart from agreeing to be
bound by the Rules generally.”
This is CFJ 3708. I assign this CFJ to G.
