I was about to say that I favored the CFJ but oh well. On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 19:49, D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I CFJ: “The parties to an existing contract CAN agree to amend it by > adding additional players as parties, even if those additional players did > not expressly agree to be party to that contract apart from agreeing to be > bound by the Rules generally.” > > This is CFJ 3708. I assign this CFJ to G. > > > > >