ais523 wrote:
> I note in passing that scams of the type that coppro is attempting atm
> could, in future, be resolved by assigning ID numbers to players.
"Who is Number One?"
"Michael Norrish is, Number Six."
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 14:39 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, ais523 wrote:
> > I note in passing that scams of the type that coppro is attempting atm
> > could, in future, be resolved by assigning ID numbers to players. This
> > is also arguably a bug in rule 2161.
>
> proto-proto:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, ais523 wrote:
> I note in passing that scams of the type that coppro is attempting atm
> could, in future, be resolved by assigning ID numbers to players. This
> is also arguably a bug in rule 2161.
proto-proto: Upon a judicial finding that an entity has a confusing name,
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Alex Smith wrote:
> (I can't afford to make this proposal Distributable right now, but it
> can wait until next week without issue.)
I'd pay for it if you hadn't just told us not to. -G.
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Warrigal wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:23 PM, ais523 wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 17:17 -0400, Warrigal wrote:
> >> Do you mean "Head Gardener: 2"?
> >
> > No; they're equal in the original proposal. And 2 is the default.
>
> At least fix the spelling of "gardener"
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:23 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 17:17 -0400, Warrigal wrote:
>> Do you mean "Head Gardener: 2"?
>
> No; they're equal in the original proposal. And 2 is the default.
At least fix the spelling of "gardener".
—Proofreader Tanner L. Swett
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 17:17 -0400, Warrigal wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > Grand Vizier: 3
> > Head Gardner: 3
> > Crown Prince: 1
>
> Do you mean "Head Gardener: 2"?
No; they're equal in the original proposal. And 2 is the default.
--
ais523
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> Grand Vizier: 3
> Head Gardner: 3
> Crown Prince: 1
Do you mean "Head Gardener: 2"?
—Proofreader Tanner L. Swett
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 21:48 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, "Distributed Proposal 6830", AI 2, II
> 1:
It may be more interesting if this one stays undistributable until the
actual 6830 is distributed, in which case there is a nice clash between
rules 2161 and 1586 that
9 matches
Mail list logo
