On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 09/19/2010 08:57 PM, Taral wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:40 PM, omd wrote:
> > > I intend to appeal this with two support. I believe that this
> > > judgement is correct, but should clarify that failing to check did not
> > > actually absolve co
On 09/19/2010 08:57 PM, Taral wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:40 PM, omd wrote:
I intend to appeal this with two support. I believe that this
judgement is correct, but should clarify that failing to check did not
actually absolve coppro of any liability were eir original belief in
Wooble's IA
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:40 PM, omd wrote:
> I intend to appeal this with two support. I believe that this
> judgement is correct, but should clarify that failing to check did not
> actually absolve coppro of any liability were eir original belief in
> Wooble's IADoP-ness not quite so certain.
3 matches
Mail list logo
