On 09/19/2010 08:57 PM, Taral wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:40 PM, omd<c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote:I intend to appeal this with two support. I believe that this judgement is correct, but should clarify that failing to check did not actually absolve coppro of any liability were eir original belief in Wooble's IADoP-ness not quite so certain.That's really not the point of appeals. If you want clarification, just ask the judge for it.
Yes it is. -coppro
