On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:40 PM, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: > I intend to appeal this with two support. I believe that this > judgement is correct, but should clarify that failing to check did not > actually absolve coppro of any liability were eir original belief in > Wooble's IADoP-ness not quite so certain.
That's really not the point of appeals. If you want clarification, just ask the judge for it. -- Taral <tar...@gmail.com> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Unknown
