On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 14:40 +, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 6 Jan 2009, at 05:44, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
> > ehird http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2326
>
> i end the pre trial phaseihjreu90yug9 u4983u5jiosjddsf
>
> Oops, I almost fell asleep on my keyboard.
I NoV ehi
comex wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> As CotC, I inform the following players of the following criminal
>> cases naming them as the defendant, and invite them to rebut the
>> argument for their guilt.
>>
>> j http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> As CotC, I inform the following players of the following criminal
> cases naming them as the defendant, and invite them to rebut the
> argument for their guilt.
>
> j http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2325
> ehird ht
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 19:03 -0500, comex wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > I inform the PerlNomic Partnership of the following criminal cases
> > against it, and invite it to rebut the argument for its guilt. (I
> > don't think it's capable of sending arbitrary messag
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I inform the PerlNomic Partnership of the following criminal cases
> against it, and invite it to rebut the argument for its guilt. (I
> don't think it's capable of sending arbitrary messages in a timely
> fashion, so I also u
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 02:46:03 am Ed Murphy wrote:
> I inform the parties of the AAA of this case:
> http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2255
I suggest waiting to see whether the current W3O attempt to fix the
contract goes through, and then evaluating the equitability of
warrigal wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Goethe, I inform you of this criminal case, and invite you to rebut the
>> argument for your guilt:
>> http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2229
>
> Did this publication cause that CFJ to be a
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Goethe, I inform you of this criminal case, and invite you to rebut the
> argument for your guilt:
> http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2229
Did this publication cause that CFJ to be assigned the number 2229, o
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
> In this case I'm using the courts in an attempt to glean
> information about the contract in question. The criminal case is not
> intended to be an attack on you (sorry if you took it that way), and was
> not meant to be a punishment or anything;
Way back
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 21 Oct 2008, at 00:09, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>> It also means that "fishing expeditions" led by non-members armed
>> with the potential name of a contract (but nothing more) should be
>> discouraged by the Rules lest the means become a burden. I hope t
On 21 Oct 2008, at 00:09, Kerim Aydin wrote:
It also means that "fishing expeditions" led by non-members armed
with the potential name of a contract (but nothing more) should be
discouraged by the Rules lest the means become a burden. I hope the
current case does so discourage.
Scam plotting
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:32, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Unless of course you'd rather the courts stayed out of your private
>> affairs, in which case this is part of the full implications that you
>> weigh when not doing something that you SHOULD.
>
> It was cr
On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:39, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Bha hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Oh thanks ehird, that's
sincerely the best
ironic laugh I've had in this forum since you joined.
I'd love for you to point out the things I've done to make that
hypocritical, if you
please.
--
ehird
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> It was created in Agora. It is bound by the rules of Agora. Agora is not a
> host
> for your
> personal ninja club any more than incidentally. They're not your "private
> affairs".
Bha hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. O
On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:32, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Unless of course you'd rather the courts stayed out of your private
affairs, in which case this is part of the full implications that you
weigh when not doing something that you SHOULD. I'm please that the
UNDEAD (*if* it exists, its existence I neit
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
> This is, of course, why you SHOULD inform the Notary; so that judicial
> cases with respect to the contract can go through expediently.
Actually, it occurs to me that "informing the Notary of parties" !=
"informing the Notary on how to contact parties".
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
> Well, the way it used to be was that the judge did informs, and the
> Notary informed them of the parties. A proposal a while back introduced
> a bug in this by changing the informs from the judge to the CotC (it was
> after I joined, so quite recent). This
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 15:14 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 22:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >> I inform the parties to the following contracts of the following equity
> >> cases, and invite them to submit arguments regarding the equitabil
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 22:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> I inform the parties to the following contracts of the following equity
>> cases, and invite them to submit arguments regarding the equitability of
>> the situation:
>> UNDEAD
>> http://zenith.homelin
Goethe wrote:
> I hereby ban from judging this case the only player with the most
> recent registration who is not a member of the alleged contract whose
> existence is not confirmed by this message.
I'm interpreting this as referring to the People's Bank of Agora.
On 28 Sep 2008, at 23:46, Ed Murphy wrote:
No, you don't.
Indeed! I was ... er... seeing if you'd pick up on that!
tusho wrote:
> On 28 Sep 2008, at 22:29, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>> Ivan Hope, tusho, I inform you of equity case 2119 and invite you to
>> submit arguments regarding the equitability of the situation.
>>
>> http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2119
> I end the pre-trial phase on this
On 28 Sep 2008, at 23:22, comex wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Referencing Goethe's most recent thoughts, I recommend a very long
CHOKEY
for me.
Y'know, I recommend EXILE.
Good to know.
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Referencing Goethe's most recent thoughts, I recommend a very long CHOKEY
> for me.
Y'know, I recommend EXILE.
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 17:51 -0400, ihope wrote:
> I hereby submit an argument regarding the equitability of the
> situation.
ISIDTID...
--
ais523
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ivan Hope, tusho, I inform you of equity case 2119 and invite you to
> submit arguments regarding the equitability of the situation.
>
> http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2119
I hereby submit an argument regar
> Sgeo - 2113
I already made my arguments, so I end the pre-trial phase.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Such is Agora.
>
> tusho
Don't forget to end your pre-trial periods.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
All the relevant arguments I've already made, complete with quotes and
signatures:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree to the following pledge
> {
> I pledge to, upon a player giving me eir entire supply of a currency,
> give said player all of my supply of
Ivan Hope wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ivan Hope, Sgeo, I inform you of CFJ 2067 and invite you to submit
>> arguments regarding the equitability of the situation.
>
> I ask that you include all the relevant arguments I've already made.
Pleas
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ivan Hope, Sgeo, I inform you of CFJ 2067 and invite you to submit
> arguments regarding the equitability of the situation.
I ask that you include all the relevant arguments I've already made.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
31 matches
Mail list logo
