On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 15:14 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 22:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >> I inform the parties to the following contracts of the following equity
> >> cases, and invite them to submit arguments regarding the equitability of
> >> the situation:
> >> UNDEAD
> >> http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2223
> > CoE: do you know that all the parties to UNDEAD are subscribed to
> > agora-business?
>
> There's an interesting bug. If I make the members of an arbitrary
> contract the "usual" members plus my non-nomic friend whose email I
> decline to provide (but provide evidence with email redacted that e
> read the contract etc.) does that halt any equity case?
>
Well, the way it used to be was that the judge did informs, and the
Notary informed them of the parties. A proposal a while back introduced
a bug in this by changing the informs from the judge to the CotC (it was
after I joined, so quite recent). This is, of course, why you SHOULD
inform the Notary; so that judicial cases with respect to the contract
can go through expediently.
--
ais523
