On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Perhaps you could amend the IBA to pay for ergs transferred to it in
> the first 48 hours of the week. Thus, players could give away ergs
> they don't plan on using that week so as to buy more when they need
> them later.
That would result
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 8:32 PM, comex wrote:
> I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment. The
> eligible voters are the parties to the IBA, the options are FOR,
> AGAINST, and PRESENT, and I am the vote collector.
>
> - Replace the entire text of the contract with "Cl?sed
comex wrote:
Unfilled Offers (can be filled by announcement):
BUY [you pay zm]
Offerer Cost Selling
Pavitra 500zmMinister without Portfolio
SELL [you get zm]
Offerer Selling Cost
BobTHJ 100zm Play Absolv-o-Matic, specifying BobTHJ
[x8] woggle 20zm
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> comex wrote:
>>
>> [x10] woggle 20zm 7 Crop
>> [x6] woggle 14zm 8 Crop
>
> I fulfill these offers.
I'm interpreting this as filling the offer only once (not 10/6 times
respectively).
--
-c.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
>> Dunce Cap 0
>>
> What about having a negative rate for this one?
See the motion I just posted :)
--
-c.
2009/10/27 comex :
> I intend, without two objections in 48 hours, to effect the following Rate
> List:
> [Added new cards, changed relative deck cost and card values based on
> actual usage patterns.]
>
> asset rate (zm)
> --
>
> (...)
>
> Dunce Cap 0
>
Wha
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 18:37, comex wrote:
> in which I realize that Stool Pigeon and Shrink Potion were both
> assigned the abbreviation SP, causing my automation to charge Shrink
> Potion's rate for Stool Pigeons..
>
>
We don't because the Speaker could deposit eir major arcana then form
a government to get them back and stuff like that.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 23, 2009, at 5:45 AM, Charles Walker > wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:37 AM, comex wrote:
BUY [you pay zm]
Offerer Cost Selling
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:37 AM, comex wrote:
> BUY [you pay zm]
> Offerer Cost Selling
> Pavitra 500zm Minister without Portfolio
Don't we have rates for the Major Arcana? If not, I guess we should make some.
--
Charles Walker
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 13:45, comex wrote:
> ===
>
> Industrial Bank & Agora Report
> Date of this report: 19 October 2009
>
> President of the IBA: comex
>
> ==
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> I deposit 3 * WRV for 390zm.
I think this affects my later withdrawal.
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:09 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 8:45 PM, comex wrote:
>>> ===
>>>
>>> Industrial Bank & Agora Report
>
>> CoE:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 8:45 PM, comex wrote:
>> ===
>>
>> Industrial Bank & Agora Report
> CoE: You are missing my recent withdraws and deposits. Look for 'BUS:
>
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:20 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 13:17 -0700, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> > ais523 500
>> > *coppro 349
>>
>> CoE: You recorded ais523 as having deposited my Government Ball.
>
> I did, I stole it from the bank then sold it b
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 13:17 -0700, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > ais523 500
> > *coppro 349
>
> CoE: You recorded ais523 as having deposited my Government Ball.
I did, I stole it from the bank then sold it back. (Or at least, I did
for some Ball, I forget which o
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:48, Charles Walker
>> wrote:
>>> I deposit 3 * X Crop for 300zm.
>>
>> This fails, you have no X crops to deposit.
>
> comex, I believe your 'Ask Bob' finction
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:48, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> I deposit 3 * X Crop for 300zm.
>
> This fails, you have no X crops to deposit.
comex, I believe your 'Ask Bob' finction is broken: BobTHJ's site
shows me with no X Crops but iba.qoid.u
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:48, Charles Walker
wrote:
> I deposit 3 * X Crop for 300zm.
This fails, you have no X crops to deposit.
BobTHJ
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> I deposit 4 * Debate-o-Matic. (It's just not a good idea these days to
> have excess cards lying around.)
You're out of proposals?
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 19:21, comex wrote:
> This would be so much nicer if I hadn't deleted orange. Maybe I
> should just give up and make you President, you're tracking everything
> anyway.
>
FYI, I'm hoping to borrow your idea of having the system capture a-b
and a-o messages and then allowing
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 21:23, Sean Hunt wrote:
> comex wrote:
>> ===
>>
>> Industrial Bank & Agora Report
>> Date of this report: 1 September 2009
>>
>> President of the IBA: comex
>>
>> ===
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> I IBA Deposit one 6 crop, one 5 crop, one 7 crop, and one 8 crop.
You now have 108zm.
> I IBA Withdraw one WRV.
Fails, as you noted; the rate of WRVs is 130zm.
--
-c.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 16:50, comex wrote:
> ===
>
> Industrial Bank & Agora Report
IBA transactions have been added to my system and a live copy of the
IBA report can be found at
http://nomic.bob-space.com/agoralog.aspx?
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Jonatan
Kilhamn wrote:
> If I'm not already a member of it, I join the IBA.
> If I'm an eligible voter (ie I was already a member) I vote FOR all
> current motions to amend the IBA.
You were already a member. You have 130 zm.
--
-c.
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> The self-ratified AAA report shows the following holdings in the bank:
>
> Farmer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X WRV
> -
> IBA 3 2 0 0
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 16:23, comex wrote:
> Current Rates:
>
> asset rate (zm) # in bank
> -
> 0 Crop 11 3
> 1 Crop 11 6
> 2 Crop 45
> 3 Crop 21 2
> 4 Crop 23 1
> 5 Crop 27
> 6 Crop
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 14:29, comex wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:02 PM, comex wrote:
>> I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in
>> diff format). The eligible voters are the parties to the IBA, the
>> options are FOR, AGAINST, and PRESENT, and I am the vote collec
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I disagree. The first is not fatal to the contract. The zm exchange
> mechanism, while diminished in usefulness without an offer system, is
> still useful. I would have used it today with my AAA crops were it not
> for the fact that a report had
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I hereby inform the parties of this case:
> http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2636
> and invite em to submit arguments regarding the equitability of the
> situation.
Arguments: Couldn't you have waited until I became active? Mor
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I disagree. The first is not fatal to the contract. The zm exchange
> mechanism, while diminished in usefulness without an offer system, is
> still useful. I would have used it today with my AAA crops were it not
> for the fact that a report had
Sean Hunt wrote:
> Benjamin Caplan wrote:
>> Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> My specific complaints are as follows:
>>>
>>> - The IBA does not have a functioning offer system as it cannot
>>> platonically act on behalf of a player.
>>> - The Rates of assets have not been kept updated.
>>> -
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>> My specific complaints are as follows:
>>
>> - The IBA does not have a functioning offer system as it cannot
>> platonically act on behalf of a player.
>> - The Rates of assets have not been kept updated.
>> - The President has not rece
Sean Hunt wrote:
> My specific complaints are as follows:
>
> - The IBA does not have a functioning offer system as it cannot
> platonically act on behalf of a player.
> - The Rates of assets have not been kept updated.
> - The President has not recently published a report.
The
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> 2009/6/4 comex :
>> While everyone else mounts a run on the bank in panic.
>
> If you are trying to improve on the perceived flaws of the PBA I'm
> surprised that you're relying on any human behavior whatsoever.
The above is not a desired outc
2009/6/4 comex :
> While everyone else mounts a run on the bank in panic.
If you are trying to improve on the perceived flaws of the PBA I'm
surprised that you're relying on any human behavior whatsoever.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Benjamin Caplan
wrote:
> Also AGAINST. There must be a better way than invalidating the
> transaction completely. Maybe a general rule for disambiguating?
Well... if you're depositing so many assets (and getting such a low
multiplier) that it's ambiguous, you proba
Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 16:19, Benjamin
> Caplan wrote:
>> comex wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:58 PM, comex wrote:
I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in
diff format). ?The eligible voters are the parties to the IBA, the
option
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 16:19, Benjamin
Caplan wrote:
> comex wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:58 PM, comex wrote:
>>> I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in
>>> diff format). �The eligible voters are the parties to the IBA, the
>>> options are FOR, AGAINST, and PRES
He had it for B.
On 2009-06-03, Ed Murphy wrote:
> c-walker wrote:
>
>> No, you're right. I thought I had joined. I join the IBA.
>>
>> --
>> C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
>
> NttPF (and there's Agoran precedent that your .sig doesn't work,
> as one cannot rely on every
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> c-walker wrote:
>
>> No, you're right. I thought I had joined. I join the IBA.
>>
>> --
>> C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
>
> NttPF (and there's Agoran precedent that your .sig doesn't work,
> as one cannot rely on every
c-walker wrote:
> No, you're right. I thought I had joined. I join the IBA.
>
> --
> C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
NttPF (and there's Agoran precedent that your .sig doesn't work,
as one cannot rely on everyone being subscribed to a-d)
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:40 PM, comex wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:28 PM, comex wrote:
> >> I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in
> >> diff format). The eligible voters are the parties to the IBA,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:28 PM, comex wrote:
>> I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in
>> diff format). The eligible voters are the parties to the IBA, the
>> options are FOR, AGAINST, and PRESENT, and I am th
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:43, comex wrote:
> I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendments (in
> diff format). The eligible voters are the parties to the contract,
> the options are FOR, AGAINST, and PRESENT, and I am the vote
> collector. I vote FOR the Motion to Amend.
I
44 matches
Mail list logo
