On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > Gratuitous: The first method being limited to the announcer is an
> > inherent part of it, and similarly without-objection is an inherent
> > part of the second. Past exceptions to this common-sense appro
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Gratuitous: The first method being limited to the announcer is an
> inherent part of it, and similarly without-objection is an inherent
> part of the second. Past exceptions to this common-sense approach
> have depended on alternate constructi
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Didn't this come up in another scam, that "otherwise impossible"
> includes things that are "regulated" as being "otherwise impossible to
> change" except as defined? I say "came up", I don't say I remember the
> decision!
http://zenith.homel
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, omd wrote:
> I cause Mr. Incredible to make each of the following players inactive:
Huh. I could have sworn I secured activity when I used it for a scam
last year.
> Arguments: Making ais523 inactive is an action that is "not otherwise
> IMPOSSIBLE"-- in particular, ais52
4 matches
Mail list logo
