On Sat, 2017-05-20 at 16:25 +, Quazie wrote:
> Okay - So this one certainly isn't a registration, right? This is
> just an introduction to a CuddleBeam.
Right, it's not even reasonably unambiguously an intent to register.
For example, if Bucky turned up and said hi, I wouldn't assume that
Buc
On Sat, 20 May 2017, Quazie wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 10:04 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I was about to say: 'X is [not] a Player' is 100% certain the most
> common CFJ.
>
> On a quick count, I get 88 of those in the database. (Though a good
> percentage of those ab
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 10:04 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I was about to say: 'X is [not] a Player' is 100% certain the most common
> CFJ.
>
> On a quick count, I get 88 of those in the database. (Though a good
> percentage of those about contracts, deregistrations, and such, I don't
> know how
I was about to say: 'X is [not] a Player' is 100% certain the most common CFJ.
On a quick count, I get 88 of those in the database. (Though a good
percentage of those about contracts, deregistrations, and such, I don't
know how many are purely about registration messages - but quite a few).
F
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:47 AM Nic Evans wrote:
> On 05/20/2017 11:37 AM, caleb vines wrote:
>
> I'm fairly certain that if the bar is that intent must be "[clear] and
> reasonably [unambiguous]" and the best that can be said in favor is "some
> argument," this post does not meet that bar. There
On 05/20/2017 11:37 AM, caleb vines wrote:
I'm fairly certain that if the bar is that intent must be "[clear] and
reasonably [unambiguous]" and the best that can be said in favor is
"some argument," this post does not meet that bar. There is a non-zero
amount of reasonably ambiguous language an
Grok - Many registration attempts are questioned - i'd say it's likely the
most common class of CFJ.
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:37 AM caleb vines wrote:
> I'm fairly certain that if the bar is that intent must be "[clear] and
> reasonably [unambiguous]" and the best that can be said in favor is "
I'm fairly certain that if the bar is that intent must be "[clear] and
reasonably [unambiguous]" and the best that can be said in favor is "some
argument," this post does not meet that bar. There is a non-zero amount of
reasonably ambiguous language and intent which makes me believe this would
not
On Sat, 20 May 2017, CuddleBeam wrote:
> Hello I am Cuddlebeam!
> I hope this message goes through lol.
Ok, I *definitely* predict CFJ with this one...
And,
Hi Cuddlebeam!
There's some argument to be made that sending a message to BUS suggest e
intended to do an action, and the most reasonable action is registration...
On 05/20/2017 11:25 AM, Quazie wrote:
Okay - So this one certainly isn't a registration, right? This is
just an introduction to a CuddleBeam.
Okay - So this one certainly isn't a registration, right? This is just an
introduction to a CuddleBeam.
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:12 AM CuddleBeam
wrote:
> Hello I am Cuddlebeam!
>
> I hope this message goes through lol.
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
