On 05/20/2017 11:37 AM, caleb vines wrote:
I'm fairly certain that if the bar is that intent must be "[clear] and
reasonably [unambiguous]" and the best that can be said in favor is
"some argument," this post does not meet that bar. There is a non-zero
amount of reasonably ambiguous language and intent which makes me
believe this would not count as a registration.
If the post used any language implying Playership like a synonym or
conjugation of "play" or "join," I'd agree that it's reasonably
unambiguous. As is, I'm not convinced.
There's considerable precedent that nothing like that is necessary. CFJ
2972 held that omd registered with the message "Guess what I intend to
do at this time?".Many other such examples exist.
Also sorry to Cuddlebeam. We just had a kerfuffle about this
yesterday, which is probably a reason why it's a Big Deal.
Ambiguous registration is probably the most common thing to CFJ, and
also common to do on purpose.
-grok
On May 20, 2017 11:30 AM, "Nic Evans" <nich...@gmail.com
<mailto:nich...@gmail.com>> wrote:
There's some argument to be made that sending a message to BUS
suggest e intended to do an action, and the most reasonable action
is registration...
On 05/20/2017 11:25 AM, Quazie wrote:
Okay - So this one certainly isn't a registration, right? This
is just an introduction to a CuddleBeam.
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:12 AM CuddleBeam
<cuddleb...@googlemail.com <mailto:cuddleb...@googlemail.com>> wrote:
Hello I am Cuddlebeam!
I hope this message goes through lol.
