On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> With support from Elysion and Murphy, I send the following message on
> behalf of the judicial panel in CFJ 2276a:
> {{{
> There is only one interpretation of rule 2126, 2156, 683
> and 754 that does not lead to a contradiction, which obeys
> th
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Joshua Boehme wrote:
>> There is only one interpretation of rule 2126, 2156, 683
>> and 754 that does not lead to a contradiction, which obeys
>> the letter of all the rules in question...
>
> I support this. Referencing rule 683 is what won me over, BTW.
>
Actually me too, I'
2 matches
Mail list logo
