On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Joshua Boehme wrote: >> There is only one interpretation of rule 2126, 2156, 683 >> and 754 that does not lead to a contradiction, which obeys >> the letter of all the rules in question... > > I support this. Referencing rule 683 is what won me over, BTW. >
Actually me too, I'd completely overlooked 683 in all my earlier readings. -G.
