On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> With support from Elysion and Murphy, I send the following message on
> behalf of the judicial panel in CFJ 2276a:
> {{{
> There is only one interpretation of rule 2126, 2156, 683
> and 754 that does not lead to a contradiction, which obeys
> the letter of all the rules in question, which doesn't go
> strongly against game custom or rely on an unintended
> ambiguity; that is, that rule 683 sees ehird's voting
> limit as 1 (per rule 2156) increased by 50 (per rule 2126),
> and thus as 51. Therefore, the AFO's assessment of proposal
> 5956 was correct, and it was adopted. This panel hereby
> rules OVERRULE/FALSE on CFJ 2276a.
> }}}I'm going to go ahead and add the results of the proposal in question to the FLR... any objections? anyone who will nominate someone else for Rulekeepor if I do that? :p
