On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2. Terminating the pledge is no different than terminating a
>>partnership. Are you arguing that partnerships can't be
>>terminated due to their losing R101 rights?
>
> The argu
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. Terminating the pledge is no different than terminating a
>partnership. Are you arguing that partnerships can't be
>terminated due to their losing R101 rights?
The argument's been brought up before...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
> This pledge is obviously self-contradictory. If Goethe could terminate
> HAL by announcement, e could remove eir right to call CFJs. By rule 101,
> this is obviously impossible.
>
> Also, HAL is not party to that pledge, so you can't Mousetrap em like
> tha
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 14:25 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I agree to the following pledge, called HAL:
>
> 1. By pledge of Goethe, HAL is a biological organism that can communicate
> in English. Goethe may act on behalf of HAL by announcement. Goethe
> may terminate HAL by announcement.
comex wrote:
> This has nothing to do with what a contract says. Obligations are
> managed by the Rules and need not correspond to what we would call an
> ordinary-language obligation, any more than a Land must be a part of
> planet Earth or a Crop edible. Partnerships do devolve "legal
> obliga
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You have said in your judgment that if the *entity itself* defines itself
> as P, despite external evidence to the contrary, then it is in fact in
> class A, and the only way it is not in A is if the rules apply a
> punishme
On Sat, 18 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> The key point of CFJ 2208 was that the rules relieve the contract of
> the responsibility for enforcement and assume that responsibility
> themselves. I can't see how this situation is in any way analogous.
It is precisely analogous. The rules say:
If (co
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree to the following pledge, called HAL:
>
> 1. By pledge of Goethe, HAL is a biological organism that can communicate
>in English. Goethe may act on behalf of HAL by announcement. Goethe
>may terminate HAL b
Goethe wrote:
> I agree to the following pledge, called HAL:
>
> 1. By pledge of Goethe, HAL is a biological organism that can communicate
> in English. Goethe may act on behalf of HAL by announcement. Goethe
> may terminate HAL by announcement.
>
> On behalf of HAL, I announce that
9 matches
Mail list logo
