DIS: Re: BUS: Change of VC laws

2007-11-27 Thread Ed Murphy
Zefram wrote: Josiah Worcester wrote: I submit the following proposal, entitled "No decay!": avpx is a coauthor of this proposal. Interest index of 2. Adoption index of 2. Amend rule 2126 to read: It's not entirely clear to me where you intend the text of the proposal to start. If it starts

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Change of VC laws

2007-11-27 Thread Zefram
> * Change "N+1 to increase another player's VVLOP by N" >to "N to increase another player's VVLOP by floor(N/2)" > * Change "N+2 to increase your own VVLOP by N" >to "N to increase your own VVLOP by floor(N/3)" > * Change "N+1 to decrease another player's VVLOP by N" >to

DIS: Re: BUS: Change of VC laws

2007-11-25 Thread Ed Murphy
pikhq wrote: I submit the following proposal, entitled "No decay!": Amend rule 2126 to read: When a proposed amendment leaves most of a rule the same, it's customary to specify just the changes. This makes its net effect easier to determine, and avoids the risk that it will inadvertently w