Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ: Consent or not

2007-11-19 Thread Zefram
Levi Stephen wrote: >Actually, CotC Zefram, upon rereading, although they concern the same >action, they seem to concern separate issues, so linked assignment does not >seem appropriate. I came to the same conclusion. -zefram

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ: Consent or not

2007-11-18 Thread Levi Stephen
Josiah Worcester wrote: On Sunday 18 November 2007 19:37:18 comex wrote: On Sunday 18 November 2007, Levi Stephen wrote: I CFJ on the following statements, requesting linked assignment, barring pikhq. Gratuitous arguments: http://cfj.qoid.us/1722 http://cfj.qoid.us/1714 I note that "support

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ: Consent or not

2007-11-18 Thread Josiah Worcester
On Sunday 18 November 2007 19:37:18 comex wrote: > On Sunday 18 November 2007, Levi Stephen wrote: > > I CFJ on the following statements, requesting linked assignment, barring > > pikhq. > Gratuitous arguments: > http://cfj.qoid.us/1722 > http://cfj.qoid.us/1714 > I note that "support" may reason

DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ: Consent or not

2007-11-18 Thread Levi Stephen
Levi Stephen wrote: I CFJ on the following statements, requesting linked assignment, barring pikhq. Actually, CotC Zefram, upon rereading, although they concern the same action, they seem to concern separate issues, so linked assignment does not seem appropriate. I'll trust your judgement o

DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ: Consent or not

2007-11-18 Thread comex
On Sunday 18 November 2007, Levi Stephen wrote: > I CFJ on the following statements, requesting linked assignment, barring > pikhq. Gratuitous arguments: http://cfj.qoid.us/1722 http://cfj.qoid.us/1714 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.