Josiah Worcester wrote:
On Sunday 18 November 2007 19:37:18 comex wrote:
On Sunday 18 November 2007, Levi Stephen wrote:
I CFJ on the following statements, requesting linked assignment, barring
pikhq.
Gratuitous arguments:
http://cfj.qoid.us/1722
http://cfj.qoid.us/1714
I note that "support" may reasonably be considered, in this case, a synonym
for consent (note that I treated it as such). Therefore, the class of
eligible voters, the matter to be decided, and the identity of the vote
collector were all known.
So, this case (to me) seems to hinge around whether or not "Agoran Support"
could be considered a non-ambiguous synonym for "Agoran Consent" via rule
754.
Gratuitous counter agrument:
Agoran Support is ambiguous, as "With Support" is defined in rule 2124(a) as
being equivalent to "With 1 Supporter".
Levi
