On 6/11/2020 1:01 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:58 PM James Cook via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>>> In general, defining one method for doing something excludes
>> "unregulated"
>>> methods from working, but doesn't
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:58 PM James Cook via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > In general, defining one method for doing something excludes
> "unregulated"
> > methods from working, but doesn't exclude other regulated methods in the
> > rules from working.
> >
> > F
> In general, defining one method for doing something excludes "unregulated"
> methods from working, but doesn't exclude other regulated methods in the
> rules from working.
>
> For example, saying (under certain conditions) that the Herald CAN award
> Champion by announcement (Rule 2449) doesn't p
On 6/11/2020 12:17 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> In fact, I'm a little worried that associating a fee with winning the
>>> game might mean you always need to pay that fee to perform that action.
>>> E.g. even if you had 20 more victory cards than anyone else, R2579 would
>>> *sti
On 6/11/20 3:17 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> Why does the wording make a difference?
>
> I thought my comment applied to the 1,000 Coin rule as well, but
> didn't bring it up because that's about to be repealed.
>
> - Falsifian
R2125 permits multiple methods and strongly implies t
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 17:36, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 6/11/2020 10:12 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, 9 June 2020, 20:16:09 GMT+1, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 6/9/2020 11:21 AM, Alex Smith via agora-discussion wrote:
> >>
On 6/11/2020 10:12 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 9 June 2020, 20:16:09 GMT+1, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>> On 6/9/2020 11:21 AM, Alex Smith via agora-discussion wrote:
I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling", AI-1:
> A player CAN
> On Tuesday, 9 June 2020, 20:16:09 GMT+1, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > On 6/9/2020 11:21 AM, Alex Smith via agora-discussion wrote:
> > > I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling", AI-1:
> > >> A player CAN win the game, but it will cost em 100 barrels.
> > > This is unu
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:29 PM grok via agora-business
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020, 3:06 PM Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > what is ISTIDDIES?
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:59 PM Alex Smith via agora-discussion <
> > agora-discussion@agorano
what is ISTIDDIES?
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:59 PM Alex Smith via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 9 June 2020, 20:16:09 GMT+1, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > On 6/9/2020 11:21 AM, Alex Smith via agora-discussion wrote:
> > > I submit the fo
On 6/9/20 3:00 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/9/20 2:14 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> Is there any reason this isn't just "A player CAN spend 100 barrels to win
>>> the game"?
>> tbh, because I was a little bored with that stock phrasing, and the
>> reaction to it f
On 6/9/20 2:14 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Is there any reason this isn't just "A player CAN spend 100 barrels to win
>> the game"?
> tbh, because I was a little bored with that stock phrasing, and the
> reaction to it from commenters so far shows that IMO we've got a bit of a
>
On Tuesday, 9 June 2020, 20:16:09 GMT+1, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 6/9/2020 11:21 AM, Alex Smith via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling", AI-1:
> >> A player CAN win the game, but it will cost em 100 barrels.
> > This is unusual wordin
On 6/9/2020 11:21 AM, Alex Smith via agora-discussion wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling", AI-1:
>> A player CAN win the game, but it will cost em 100 barrels.
> This is unusual wording for this, and it looks a lot like it would permit a
> player to win the game without
I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling", AI-1:
> A player CAN win the game, but it will cost em 100 barrels.
This is unusual wording for this, and it looks a lot like it would permit a
player to win the game without having 100 barrels.
Is there any reason this isn't just "A player CAN
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 12:25 PM nch via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 6/9/20 11:05 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> >
> > I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling", AI-1:
> >
> >
> > Create a power-1 rule,
On 6/9/2020 9:25 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/9/20 11:05 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>>
>> I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling", AI-1:
>>
>>
>> Create a power-1 rule, "The General Sto
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 16:25, nch via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 6/9/20 11:05 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> >
> > I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling", AI-1:
> >
> >
> > Create a power-1 rule, "The
On 6/9/20 11:05 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>
> I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling", AI-1:
>
>
> Create a power-1 rule, "The General Store", with the following text:
>
>Barrels are a currenc
19 matches
Mail list logo
