On Dec 18, 2008, at 9:50 AM, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 18 Dec 2008, at 12:34, Bayes wrote:
Bayes submits the following proposal, titled "Repeal
'Contracts'" (AI=2, II=0):
{
Repeal Rule 1742 (Contracts).
}
Yespls
Mee tu!
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
On 18 Dec 2008, at 12:34, Bayes wrote:
Bayes submits the following proposal, titled "Repeal
'Contracts'" (AI=2, II=0):
{
Repeal Rule 1742 (Contracts).
}
Yespls
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Bayes wrote:
> Bayes submits the following proposal, titled "Repeal 'Foreign communications'"
> (AI=1, II=0): {
> Repeal Rule 2184 (Foreign communications).
> }
I'll vote for this one. After all, what if a foreign nomic says that
an appropriate forum for commun
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11 Dec 2008, at 12:34, Bayes wrote:
>
>> Bayes submits the following proposal, titled "Repeal 'Separation of
>> Powers'"
>> (AI=2, II=0): {
>> Repeal Rule 1450 (Separation of Powers).
>> }
>
> I wonder if the current ru
On 11 Dec 2008, at 12:34, Bayes wrote:
Bayes submits the following proposal, titled "Repeal 'Separation of
Powers'"
(AI=2, II=0): {
Repeal Rule 1450 (Separation of Powers).
}
I wonder if the current rule is "only make Terrible Proposals".
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Bayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> (My initial random selection: Rules 754, 2135, 2034, 217, 1728)
>
> Boo. All Power 3 rules.
Yup, this week's proposals are terrible.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Bayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (My initial random selection: Rules 754, 2135, 2034, 217, 1728)
Boo. All Power 3 rules.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Bayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (My initial random selection: Rules , 2188, 1688, 2206, 1586)
Truly random this time, I promise. Bayes will now start doing eir job
properly and submit these proposals weekly.
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow. Of those five rules, I think it picked the only two that are
> essential: without Deputisation, people could hold a certain set of
> offices and thereby block everything, and without Power Controls
> Mutability, the entire p
9 matches
Mail list logo
