comex wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Amend Rule 2186 (Victory) by replacing this text:
>>
>> Winning Conditions and Losing Conditions exist only as defined
>> by rules.
>>
>> with this text:
>>
>> A Winning (Losing) Condition is a c
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amend Rule 2186 (Victory) by replacing this text:
>
> Winning Conditions and Losing Conditions exist only as defined
> by rules.
>
> with this text:
>
> A Winning (Losing) Condition is a condition defined as such
Proto-Proposal: Definition of definitions
(AI = 3, please)
Amend Rule 754 (Definition Definitions) by appending this text to
section (2):
A clause of the form "X is/are Y", where X and Y are both
nouns or noun phrases, SHOULD be interpreted as "X is/are
defined as Y
3 matches
Mail list logo
