Re: DIS: Porto-Proposal: Bring back Assets

2017-01-17 Thread Aris Merchant
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > It feels weird not to reuse the Switches framework for this. I realize you’re > reinstating an existing rule, but is it worth refactoring this to avoid > reintroducing another kind of recordable state? That's actually the main reason I'm

Re: DIS: Porto-Proposal: Bring back Assets

2017-01-16 Thread Owen Jacobson
On Jan 17, 2017, at 1:06 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: > {Reenact rule 2166, Assets (Power = 2), with the folowing text: > An asset is an entity defined as such by a rule (hereafter its backing > document), and existing solely because its backing document defines its > existence. > > Each asset

DIS: Porto-Proposal: Bring back Assets

2017-01-16 Thread Aris Merchant
{Reenact rule 2166, Assets (Power = 2), with the folowing text: An asset is an entity defined as such by a rule (hereafter its backing document), and existing solely because its backing document defines its existence. Each asset has exactly one owner. If an asset would otherwise lack an