On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > It feels weird not to reuse the Switches framework for this. I realize you’re > reinstating an existing rule, but is it worth refactoring this to avoid > reintroducing another kind of recordable state?
That's actually the main reason I'm doing it. Switches work great for _properties_, using them for possessions is just kind of weird (and doesn't work at all for unique one-off Assets). I'll add the balance boilerplate to the main Assets rule though. > >> The Secretary CAN cause Agora to pay any player or organization by >> announcement if doing so is specified by a rule. > > After the discussion on my first attempt at a payday notice, I’d strongly > prefer that this clause be rephrased, or removed in favour of “CAN and SHALL” > enabling clauses on the Secretary’s responsibilities. Any specific phrasing you have in mind? It can be deleted, but I feel like just having it in one place is better, even if it makes it longer. Plus, it helps if you want to change it later. -Aris
