On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, com...@gmail.com wrote:
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 25, 2010, at 9:03 PM, Keba wrote:
> > Perpepuum mobile is Latin for perpetual mobile machine
>
> Perpetuum actually, though I like Lab Labour
You mean Lab Laboor
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Keba wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Keba wrote:
> > > The Perpepuum mobile (PM) is a person and active player.
> >
> > Has an actual fix for The Robot scam been proposed yet? If so
> > I like this, if not... -G.
>
> Well, it's not clear
com...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 25, 2010, at 9:03 PM, Keba wrote:
> > Perpepuum mobile is Latin for perpetual mobile machine
>
> Perpetuum actually, though I like Lab Labour
Oh, you're right. Well, you should never look up a word and use it often
with a mistake of wr
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I intend to vote against any proposal that includes an act-on-behalf
> mechanism of any kind.
Oh, why? Just because of bad experiences of the past?
--
Keba
Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Keba wrote:
> > The Perpepuum mobile (PM) is a person and active player.
>
> Has an actual fix for The Robot scam been proposed yet? If so
> I like this, if not... -G.
Well, it's not clear whether the scam has worked, but there should be a
fi
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 25, 2010, at 9:03 PM, Keba wrote:
> Perpepuum mobile is Latin for perpetual mobile machine
Perpetuum actually, though I like Lab Labour
Warrigal wrote:
> "Perpepuum" isn't a word, to my knowledge; perhaps you're after the
> phrase "perpetual motion machine". "Labour" means "job" or "physical
> task", so "Lab Worker" might work better there.
>
> —Tanner L. Swett
Perpepuum mobile is Latin for perpetual mobile machine and should be
"Perpepuum" isn't a word, to my knowledge; perhaps you're after the
phrase "perpetual motion machine". "Labour" means "job" or "physical
task", so "Lab Worker" might work better there.
—Tanner L. Swett
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Keba wrote:
> The Perpepuum mobile (PM) is a person and active player.
Has an actual fix for The Robot scam been proposed yet? If so
I like this, if not... -G.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Keba wrote:
> I am going to propose something like this (but this is only a Protosal!)
>
> If anyone intents to vote against such a Proposal because e does not
> like a certain part of it, please let me know. This proposal could be
> split, if needed.
I intend to
I am going to propose something like this (but this is only a Protosal!)
If anyone intents to vote against such a Proposal because e does not
like a certain part of it, please let me know. This proposal could be
split, if needed.
Proposal "A Perpepuum mobile is possible" (AI=2, II=2, distributab
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Ed Murphy wrote:
> G. wrote:
> >> The physicist is an office and should be held by the PM. Its weekly
> >> report contains how often and by whom the PM has been powered, who is the
> >> Energy Spender and a list of all bot-PM actions of the previous seven days.
> >
> >
--- On Tue, 24/8/10, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I'm reminded of (Peekee?) submitting a "Protoposal" (instead of
> "Proto-Proposal") and Kelly saying something like "whatever the
> hell that is; presumably should be handled by the Protomotor".
That's actually not a bad idea for an office.
We probably nee
Keba wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:53:40 -0400, Geoffrey Spear
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Sgeo wrote:
CoE: You also do not have enough ergs to do this.
>>>
>>> Enough ergs to discuss something?
>>
>> Well, it was labelled "distributable via fee".
>
> ... and the mail's
G. wrote:
>> The physicist is an office and should be held by the PM. Its weekly
>> report contains how often and by whom the PM has been powered, who is the
>> Energy Spender and a list of all bot-PM actions of the previous seven days.
>
> If the PM holds this office, no real person would be
Keba wrote:
> Is this similar to the AFO? I have not read the proposal/rule of that
> player, because I did not want to get inspirated by it, I want to create
> something different.
The AFO was a contract-based legal person that any member of the
contract could control at any time by announcement
On 08/23/2010 05:21 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, ag...@kebay.org wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:11:32 -0700 (PDT), Kerim Aydin
wrote:
This violates R101(vii). The only way I can think to get around it (it
has
come up before for other non-natural players) is to re-define R1
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, ag...@kebay.org wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:11:32 -0700 (PDT), Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
> > This violates R101(vii). The only way I can think to get around it (it
> has
> > come up before for other non-natural players) is to re-define R101 so
> that
> > rights apply to "na
Oh my god, the mail looks terrible, I'm sorry. Switched to an email
client, should be better in the future ;)
--
Keba
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:11:32 -0700 (PDT), Kerim Aydin
wrote:
> This violates R101(vii). The only way I can think to get around it (it
has
> come up before for other non-natural players) is to re-define R101 so
that
> rights apply to "natural persons" only. This is probably a good idea
> anyway
>
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:53:40 -0400, Geoffrey Spear
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Sgeo wrote:
>>> CoE: You also do not have enough ergs to do this.
>>
>> Enough ergs to discuss something?
>
> Well, it was labelled "distributable via fee".
... and the mail's subject was/is "PM protos
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Sgeo wrote:
>> CoE: You also do not have enough ergs to do this.
>
> Enough ergs to discuss something?
Well, it was labelled "distributable via fee".
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, ag...@kebay.org wrote:
> Proposal "A Perpepuum mobile is possible" (AI=2, II=2, distributable via
> fee)
>
> {{{
> Enact a new Rule with power=2 entitled "Perpepuum mobile":
>
> The Perpepuum mobile (PM) is a person and active player. The PM cannot
> be deregistered o
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Aaron Goldfein
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 19:24, wrote:
>>
>> Proposal "A Perpepuum mobile is possible" (AI=2, II=2, distributable via
>> fee)
>>
>> {{{
>> Enact a new Rule with power=2 entitled "Perpepuum mobile":
>>
>> The Perpepuum mobile (PM) is
Proposal "A Perpepuum mobile is possible" (AI=2, II=2, distributable via
fee)
{{{
Enact a new Rule with power=2 entitled "Perpepuum mobile":
The Perpepuum mobile (PM) is a person and active player. The PM cannot
be deregistered or become inactive, rules to the contrary notwithstanding.
P
25 matches
Mail list logo
